POLS 3220: How to Predict the Future
“Stocks have reached what looks like a permanently high plateau.”
—Irving Fisher, Economist, October 1929
“I believe it is peace for our time.”
—Neville Chamberlain, September 30, 1938
“There’s no chance that the iPhone is going to get any significant market share. No chance.”
—Steve Ballmer, Microsoft CEO, 2007
“The overall risk to the American public does remain low.”
—CDC Director Robert Redfield, March 6, 2020
The language of uncertainty
Allows us to communicate clearly and precisely how certain we are that an event will happen.
In some contexts, probability statements seem natural:
In other contexts, feels weird:
“I believe there is 42% chance of peace in our time!”
-Neville Chamberlain, September 30, 1938
(My goal is to get you comfortable with such statements.)
A probability is a number between 0 and 1 that expresses how likely it is that an event will happen.
Developing an intuition for other probability values is trickier…
If you flip a coin 200 times, you’d expect it to come up heads roughly half the time.
This illustrates the frequentist interpretation of probability:
Formalized in the Law of Large Numbers:
The entire business model of casinos/lotteries rests on the Law of Large Numbers.
Maybe this guy comes in one night and puts $35,000 on lucky number 32. If 32 hits, the casino pays out over $1.2 million!
But if you get 10,000 of those guys placing bets like that, 37 lose for every 1 that wins…
Sometimes it will be useful to express probability as odds.
To convert probability \(p\) to odds, divide \(\frac{p}{1-p}\).
To convert odds \(p:q\) to probability, divide \(\frac{p}{p+q}\).
For events that can be repeated a large number of times, frequentist interpretation is pretty intuitive.
Probability is not an innate characteristic of the event, but a statement about the observer’s knowledge.
If you can precisely measure a coin’s initial velocity and rate of spin, you can perfectly predict what side it will land on (Diaconis et al. 2007).
Probability is not an innate characteristic of the event, but a statement about the observer’s knowledge.
No. Assessing probability is not something that comes naturally to people.
Reframe the problem as a bet.
“Would I rather have $100 if Karl Marx was born before Queen Victoria or if I draw a red ball from this jar?”
Alter the contents of the jar until you’re indifferent between the two bets.
This is called the Equivalent Bet Test (Spetzler & Staël Von Holstein, 1975; Galef, 2021)
Take 10 minutes to play “Two Truths and a Lie” with your tablemates. Pick a person to tell two truths and a lie about themselves, and everyone else must guess which is the lie.
Our twist on the game is that everyone must estimate a probability that their chosen statement is a lie. Use the Equivalent Bet Test to help calibrate your probability.
(Feel free to play multiple rounds if there is time remaining.)