Skip to contents

A dataset of 935 Wisconsin congressional campaign advertisements from the 2008 election cycle. Ad texts and pairwise annotations are drawn from Carlson & Montgomery (2017); five-point tone codes are from the Wisconsin Advertising Project (WiscAds). The score column contains textscale negativity scores derived from the pairwise comparisons in cm_comparisons.

Usage

ad_tone

Format

A tibble with 935 rows and 10 columns:

text

Full text of the advertisement.

candidate

Coded candidate identifier (factor).

state

Two-letter state abbreviation. Empty string for ads with no state on record.

tone

Numeric tone code from the Wisconsin Advertising Project (1 = Promoting, 2 = Mostly promoting, 3 = Contrasting, 4 = Mostly attacking, 5 = Attacking). NA for ads without a tone code.

alphas

Continuous negativity score from the SentimentIt model in Carlson & Montgomery (2017).

score

textscale negativity score derived from the pairwise comparisons in cm_comparisons.

score_lower

Lower bound of the 95% confidence interval for score.

score_upper

Upper bound of the 95% confidence interval for score.

split

Whether the document was in the "Train Set" or "Test Set" split used to validate the model.

tone_label

Factor version of tone with descriptive labels.

Source

Carlson, T. N., & Montgomery, J. M. (2017). A pairwise comparison framework for fast, flexible, and reliable human coding of political texts. American Political Science Review, 111(4), 835–843. doi:10.1017/S0003055417000302